Woman House

As stated on Womanhouse.net:

“Womanhouse (30 January – 28 February 1972) is remembered for its site-specific domestic installations in which artists responded to every room of a Los Angeles house they collectively renovated and occupied. [Judy] Chicago, [Miriam] Schapiro, their CalArts students, and women artists from the local community all participated. Their efforts yielded early examples of installation art, pedagogical strategies like consciousness raising, and a number of performance pieces including Faith Wilding’s Waiting, and Chicago’s Cock and Cunt Play”.

On the opening of Woman House only women were permitted to view the work. After this first day, all members of the public were allowed to enter.

The program that birthed Woman House was The Feminist Art Program that began in the California Institute of the Arts in 1971. The program was led by Judy Chicago and Miriam Schapiro and its members included the CalArts students as well as local artists from the community.

The Feminist Art Program was without appropriate space at the start of the school year which set the path that the program would tread to create an “Ideological and symbolic conflation of women and houses”. 

What interested us (being H.E.R Collective) was the process of the work as well as the final building of Woman House. Students would sit in a circle and discuss different topics in this safe space. This was intended to nourish the students and provide growth to promote a more “womb-like” atmosphere. Self-perception and reflection was key to this experience to also help prompt further ideas for Woman House. 

The problems that Schapiro and Chicago felt the students had revolved around their status as women. This included:

  1. A lack of assertiveness and ambition
  2. unwillingness to push themselves beyond limits
  3. unfamiliarity with art-making processes and tools

The aim was that by teaching women to use tools and to construct to a good standard they could “restructure their personalities to be consistent with their artistic goals”.

Schapiro and Chicago believed that:

 “society fails women by not demanding excellence from them”.

The overarching goal of this program and of Woman House was to create an all female space that promoted more inclusion of female artists and to expose the Cal Arts students to already “established” female artists not limited to Schapiro and Chicago.

Before even installing any of their own ideas of the design of the house, actual work needed to be undertaken to restore the structure of the house. The students had to build the shell to house their work before they could inhabit it. The women undertook tasks such as cleaning, painting, wallpapering, installing lights etc. throughout the course of the project; Even electrical wiring was needed to be installed which was completed by the group. Although this could be empowering, many students were not used to the 8 hour days that came with Woman House or to the fact that a lot of the Manual labour took place in the winter with no hot water or heating. It has been said that many women came to resent the work and to the administrators. To tackle this negativity, the group held meetings where these concerns could be raised and resolved through group consciousness. 

𝕆𝕦𝕣 𝕥𝕒𝕜𝕖-𝕒𝕨𝕒𝕪 𝕗𝕣𝕠𝕞 𝕎𝕠𝕞𝕒𝕟 ℍ𝕠𝕦𝕤𝕖

Annabel suggested we look at woman house not just for the end result but by the processes in which the house was made. The conversations the students had regarding the issues and how to develop their practice were of the same importance as the final result of the house itself. This alongside the initial and final renovation of the space all form a wider context that Woman House is centered within: This is what Uncovering H.E.R also hopes to achieve. 

These paralleling dialogues are what we need to include in our work to allow for a more rounded and successful practice. 

𝕀𝕞𝕒𝕘𝕖𝕤

All images taken from womanhouse.net

slide_36
As one woman visitor to my room commented, “This is exactly where women have always been—in between the sheets and on the shelf.”  It is time now to come out of the closet.
– Sandy Orgel

diningroom

diningslide_9
The Dining Room represented a greater collaborative effort than any other room in the house. Seven women painted walls, ceilings, mural, molding, sewed curtains, tablecloth, plates to hold the food; stitched and fashioned the chandelier, baked bread dough and constructed the table. Seven women behaving as adults and pretending like little girls that this giant dollhouse room was real…

kitchenslide_15kitchenslide_13

houseslide_14
The soft skin of a kitchen pink
Is openers, strainers, blenders
Is cups, pots and hot ovens
Is boxes, cans and glass packages
Is faucets and nippled knobs
A toaster, juicer and waffler
All pink skinned
How would you like your eggs done
this morning?
– Robin Weltsch

 

aprons

apronsslide_11
Come in, east…please put on the apron strings and experience the heart of the home with me.
The outside is no longer with you, you are now embraced by my nurturing pink womb, giving life—sustaining milk from my breasts.  The umbilical cord has been cut through, and you must hold on to the apron strings real tight or you might (gasp)…have to rely on yourself…tisk, tisk!
I must work harder to sustain life for you, to meet your biological needs, feed your habits with habits…I am a habit to you!  I am not a habit!  Release me, let me go, you don’t know me, you don’t own me.  I am a human being, not just a source of cheap labor for lazy people.
I want to undo these apron strings, to see what the rest of the world is doing, to see if I can help…to see myself once again.  I want to travel, to see wonders I only dream of daily…to see wonders I only dream of daily, right here in the heart of the home façade.
-Susan Frazier

Leave a comment